A professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Ishaq Akintola, speaks with BAYO AKINLOYE about the abduction saga of Ese Oruru
Is child marriage permitted in Islam, looking beyond the case of Ese Oruru?
Islam is a complete way of life. As a
religion, non-Muslims will have to take Muslims as they are, not as they
want them to be. Neither Muslims nor their religion should be judged
according to other standards. There will never be any inter-religious
understanding so long as non-Muslims continue to measure Muslims and
their way of life by Christian, Buddhist or Confucianist yardsticks. The
simple truth is: Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have
no apology for those who refuse to accept this, particularly since 99.99
per cent of such marriages are conducted among Muslims themselves. If
the man is a Muslim and the girl is also a Muslim and the girl’s parents
give their approval, what is the business of any non-Muslim in that? It
is sheer interference in the affair of Muslims and an attempt to exert
undue influence on them. More often than not, those who interfere in
this manner have ulterior motives. It is either for the purpose of
smearing the image of Islam or to gain a comparative advantage and score
a religious point (for their own faith of course).
We are not unaware of all these antics,
yet we patiently endure them. Non-Muslims should therefore keep off
Muslims’ affairs. Who are non-Muslims to be the judge of Muslims when
every religious group has its own failings? This interference often
causes unnecessary strain on Christian-Muslim relationship. Despite the
fact that our Christian neighbours sing the hymn ‘I want to be like
Jesus…’ repeatedly, they are not behaving like Jesus (peace be upon
him). Neither are they following his teachings. There will be peace if
they do. But they don’t. Jesus taught Christians to mind their own
business and to resist the temptation to judge others. He said, ‘Judge
not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you
will be judged, and the measure that you give will be the measure you
get.’
That means your organisation, Muslim Right Concern, supports child marriage?
I am a Muslim and I support all truly
Muslim practices. Our organisation, MURIC, is an Islamic human rights
outfit. So naturally we should support all principles of Islam. It
promotes Allah-given fundamental human rights as well as Allah-given
fundamental rights of all creatures, animals – mammals, invertebrates,
birds in the sky, the environment and all natural entities. Everything
created by Allah has a right. We promote their rights. MURIC believes in
all Shariah-compliant marriages, regardless of the age of the girl. The
sensationalisation of intra-Muslim marriages to the so-called minors is
uncalled for and, more often than not, done with hidden malice. For
your information, we don’t have what you call ‘child marriage’. We have
nikah (Islamic marriage). I affirm clearly, emphatically and
unequivocally, that what happens among Muslims is strictly a Muslim
affair and should remain so as long as it is Shariah-compliant.
Non-Muslims have no right to poke their noses into any religious action
taken by Muslims for Muslims. Nikah is a marriage of the Muslims
conducted by the Muslims for the Muslims. How the Muslims do it is
nobody’s business. Do we come into the church to criticise the way
marriages are conducted? Have Muslims said anything about gay marriages
inside churches? That is the Christian way of life and they should stop
attempts to impose their lifestyle on Muslims. We will never allow that.
It is an attempt to subject Muslims to public ridicule.
You cannot hold us in contempt and talk
about love. It is sheer deceit. It is hypocrisy. Even Jesus (peace be
upon him) called those who ignore their own faults to interfere in other
people’s matters, hypocrites. He said, “Why do you see the speck that
is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own
eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of
your eye’ when there is a log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take
the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the
speck out of your brother’s eye.” So, instead of paying attention to
marriages conducted among Muslims, Christians should do something about
gay marriages inside churches.
What is your view on the abduction, forceful marriage and conversion to Islam of Ese Oruru by Yunusa Dahiru?
MURIC issued a statement on this ugly
episode immediately it broke out. Let me pick the highlights. It was a
kind of Romeo and Juliet affair. We demanded that Yunusa Dahiru, the
‘boyfriend’ with whom the girl eloped, should be arrested and prosecuted
because the girl is a minor and a Christian. Attempting to marry off
the girl without her parent’s permission is not only a breach of common
law but also a violation of the Shariah provision on the need for the
parents’ approval before nikah can be deemed valid. La nikah bila waliyyin
is a basic condition before marriage can be conducted in Islam and
Qur’an 4:25 lays emphasis on this same condition. Now, we cannot talk of
forceful marriage in this case because both parents of Yunusa, the
Shari’ah Council in Kano and even the Emir himself, His Eminence Alhaji
Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, refused to conduct the marriage on the basis that
the girl is a Christian; she is underage and her parents had not given
consent. So there was no marriage.
Where is the forceful marriage they keep
talking about? But we in MURIC are displeased with the conduct of our
Romeo (Yunusa) for two major reasons: One, he did not listen to his
father who warned him not to bring the girl to Kano. Islam frowns
heavily on disobedience to parents –Qur’an 17:23; 31:14. Two, contrary
to the provisions of Qur’an 17:32 which forbids fornication and
adultery, he may have had carnal knowledge of the girl because it is now
being rumoured that Juliet (Ese) is five months pregnant. MURIC is not
going to say Yunusa is innocent just because he is a Muslim. Islam
teaches justice and fairness. The religion or tribe of the parties
involved does not matter. The Qur’an commands Muslims to ‘…Stand out
firmly for justice, as witnesses of Allah, even if the case is against
yourselves, or your parents, or your family, and whether it is against a
rich or poor man…’ That is why we called for Yunusa the Romeo’s arrest.
Ijaw youths are not looking at it from
an objective angle. They are spoiling for war. All they see is a
northerner that abducted their daughter. But is it abduction or
elopement? Can we prevent a young boy and a young girl from falling in
love with each other? Even Ese’s father has his own faults despite his
attempt to blame the Emir of Kano. But the truth is, Ese’s father has a
big portion of the blame; same with the mother. How did they train their
daughter?
But is the forceful conversion right?
Regarding Ese’s conversion, it is not
acceptable to us yet, until the girl is 18. At least, that is what the
Nigerian law says and we have to comply since we are Nigerians. The
condition for accepting conversion as valid in Islam is different,
however. It is buluug, which is maturity that matters. Buluug is measured by the time the girl starts menstruating, which may vary according to her physiological condition.
People are saying the Ese-Yunusa saga has further dented the image of Muslims in the country. Do you agree with that?
That was the aim of the propagators of this story ab initio and
I don’t think that aim has changed. Whether they have succeeded or not
is another thing anyway. But I think they failed. Yes, they failed
woefully.
Besides your organisation,
many feel the Muslim community is not bothered about the unfolding event
that has Islam at its core. Would you say major Islamic groups,
authorities and individuals are complacent about human rights?
That is not true. Where do you think
MURIC gets this deluge of information it uses very often. We network but
don’t let us talk about how we do that. Sometimes, other Islamic
organisations also rise to the occasion. Exempli gratia, the
Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs has tackled several issues
in the past. Take also the Muslim Students Society of Nigeria; look at
the way they handled the issue of the Joint Admission Matriculation
Board’s discrimination against candidates who wore hijab in the ongoing
JAMB examinations. The National Council of Muslim Youth Organisations
and The Companion have equally taken up issues at different periods. But
MURIC may be seen as different just because we specialise in human
rights, while others handle all aspects of Islamic orientation
(evangelisation, education, prayers, enlightenment, etc).
People expect groups like
NASFAT, MSSN, NSCIA and others to be involved in this issue. Does it
mean they don’t see anything wrong in Yunusa’s actions?
What is MURIC? Who provides it with
information from time to time? Is it not the organisations you mentioned
above? MURIC will be nowhere at all if all those organisations withhold
information from it. Particularly NSCIA; that is our umbrella
organisation and MURIC is tied to its umbilical cord. You will agree
with me that the present NSCIA is quite different from what we had
before. With the current dynamic and highly mobile, visionary and
exemplary leadership, NSCIA is doing quite well and I can tell you that
they are involved in this Ese Oruru saga. The fact is that MURIC
consults widely on these issues. Sometimes, the organisation is called
upon to handle some affairs. So, you must stop imagining that it is
MURIC or that it is MURIC alone. MURIC is just an errand organisation
and if you send your children to the market and they bring home what you
need, you don’t have to embark on the journey to the market by
yourself. I hope I have made myself very clear.
Religious crises are not
uncommon in the country. Is there a potential for this situation to
degenerate into a religious and tribal upheaval?
Yes, it is quite dicey. There are
extremists, terrorists and fanatics on both sides of the divide. We need
to step up enlightenment about the need for religious tolerance. But
above all, we need to leave the Muslims alone. Let the Muslims go.
Nigerian Christians should stop measuring Muslims by Christian
yardsticks. We have different norms and values. Let us respect one
another’s freedom of religion.
Yunusa is seen by many as the culprit in Ese’s predicament. Do you think he acted alone?
What else are we looking for? We have
seen Juliet. We have seen Romeo. Are we still looking for the whole
feuding Montague and Capulet families?
Would you prefer Yunusa
being tried under Sharia to being tried under the penal or criminal law,
having allegedly committed crimes across two states?
Oh yes, I would love that (to be tried under Sharia law)!
The Emir of Kano has been criticised for his alleged role in the Ese-Yunusa case. Do you think he deserves the criticisms?
Those who criticise the Emir of Kano on
this case are ethnic bigots. They are blinded by their hatred for
northerners. What do you want this man to do? He referred the case to
the Shariah Council. The latter examined it and decided the girl was too
young and she lacked parental support and approval. Pronto, the Emir
ordered that the girl be returned to her parents in Bayelsa. What has he
done wrong? What many Nigerians don’t know about His Eminence, Sanusi
Lamido Sanusi, is that he is wearing two crowns: He is an Emir and a
versatile Islamic scholar. This was something I also did not know when
he was still serving as the Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria. I came
to know later that he speaks Arabic fluently. He is a great asset, a
pearl among his peers. You can only hate him out of envy.
Following Ese’s case is a
growing number of allegations of other minors being abducted, forced
into marriage and converted to Islam. Isn’t this worrisome?
Which cases? Do you have the proof? Why
is the press more interested in investigating Muslims and anti-Muslim
whistleblowers? That is my worry. Why is the press silent about hundreds
of Muslim children taken to Christian camps from Edo State? Why isn’t
the press interested in that? People are free to beat about the bush
anyway. They have to justify their pay. The Henry Townsend spirit has to
be there too, you know.
What is the Muslim community going to do about these alleged abductions (like the one in Sokoto)?
There you go again! Baseless, clueless,
unfounded and untenable allegations; rumours, rumours and rumours! Where
you have cases, bring them forward. You cannot turn us into suspects
overnight. You know where abduction is rampant. I won’t mention states.
Why is the Nigerian press so keen on causing distractions? A whole
region has turned abduction into family and tribal business. The
Nigerian press looks the other way and starts prying into issues that
have nothing to do with abduction.
Abductions of female children for sex slavery and forced marriage have become a trend in the country. What’s the way out?
That’s not true. You are making a
mountain out of a molehill and I am not under any obligation to answer
that kind of question. It is prejudicial. I respect the press and I will
continue to cooperate with them but I will not be an accomplice to
untruth. Better still, if you must have an answer, the security agencies
are the ones who would provide an answer to your question.
Someone like Governor
Ayodele Fayose has alleged that President Muhammadu Buhari is trying to
Islamise Nigeria. Do you agree with him?
The fear is unfounded and the comment is
most unfair. Unlike Ayo Fayose, Buhari is neither a religious zealot
nor an ethnic jingoist. He (Fayose) is the worst governor Nigeria ever
had. He is trying to whip up religious sentiment. He wants to start a
religious war. People like Fayose cannot hold Nigeria together. I am
waiting for the day when he will seek a higher position at the federal
level. He holds sectarian and parochial views. He is Islamophobic.
While every patriotic Nigerian is working towards peaceful coexistence,
Fayose is actively working towards religious crisis. It is a shame and a
negation of everything he stands for as a governor. For seeking to
cause religious hullabaloo, Fayose has broken his oath of office.
Recently, President
Muhammadu Buhari refused the offer to join the Saudi-led coalition
against terror. How do you see that in view of the ongoing insurgency in
the North?
The President was right. Why should
Nigeria join an all-Muslim military alliance led by anybody? Is this an
Islamic country? I told you earlier that Islam teaches justice and
equity. We will not support such a coalition just because the President
is a Muslim. Our Christian and traditional neighbours have the right to
be carried along. Which army is Nigeria going to use if it joins such a
coalition? Is it the same Nigerian Army? Is this army made up of Muslims
alone?
[Punch Newspaper]
No comments:
Post a Comment